Public Opinion 1.1.4.3: Unterschied zwischen den Versionen
Zur Navigation springen
Zur Suche springen
(Die Seite wurde neu angelegt: „{{Public Opinion |toc=Public Opinion |zurück=Public Opinion 1.1.4.2 |vorwärts=Public Opinion 1.1.4.4 |englisch= Without Daniels' Knowledge Mr. Daniels was a…“) |
K |
||
Zeile 4: | Zeile 4: | ||
|vorwärts=Public Opinion 1.1.4.4 | |vorwärts=Public Opinion 1.1.4.4 | ||
|englisch= | |englisch= | ||
− | + | The first Senator to comment is Mr. Knox of Pennsylvania. Indignantly he demands investigation. In Mr. Brandegee of Connecticut, who spoke next, indignation has already stimulated credulity. Where Mr. Knox indignantly wishes to know if the report is true, Mr. Brandegee, a half a minute later, would like to know what would have happened if marines had been killed. Mr. Knox, interested in the question, forgets that he asked for an inquiry, and replies. If American marines had been killed, it would be war. The mood of the debate is still conditional. Debate proceeds. Mr. McCormick of Illinois reminds the Senate that the Wilson administration is prone to the waging of small unauthorized wars. He repeats Theodore Roosevelt's quip about "waging peace." More debate. Mr. Brandegee notes that the marines acted "under orders of a Supreme Council sitting somewhere," but he cannot recall who represents the United States on that body. The Supreme Council is unknown to the Constitution of the United States. Therefore Mr. New of Indiana submits a resolution calling for the facts. | |
− | |||
− | Mr. | ||
− | |||
− | |||
|deutsch= | |deutsch= | ||
}} | }} |
Version vom 5. Dezember 2017, 19:15 Uhr
Quelle
Public Opinion, Walter Lippmann, 1922.